TY - JOUR
T1 - Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification System
AU - Narayanan, Rajkishen
AU - Dalton, Jonathan
AU - Bransford, Richard
AU - Dvorak, Marcel R.
AU - Singh Chhabra, Harvinder
AU - Joaquim, Andrei F.
AU - El-Sharkawi, Mohammad
AU - Benneker, Lorin M.
AU - Schnake, Klaus
AU - Oner, Cumhur
AU - Dandurand, Charlotte
AU - Canseco, Jose A.
AU - Kepler, Christopher K.
AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.
AU - Schroeder, Gregory D.
AU - AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification System Validation Members
N1 - Schnake:
Department of
Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical Uni-
versity Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany;
PY - 2025/7/15
Y1 - 2025/7/15
N2 - Study Design.Global cross-sectional survey.Objective.To validate the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification (UCIC) across AO geographical regions/practice experience.Summary of Background Data.To create a universally validated scheme with prognostic value, AO Spine established an upper cervical spine injury classification involving three elements: injury morphology (region: I-occipital condyle and craniocervical junction; II-C1 ring and C1-2 joint; III-C2 and C2-3 joint), and (subtype: A-isolated bony injury; B-bony/ligamentous injury; C-displaced/translational injury), neurological status [N0-intact; N1-transient deficit; N2-radiculopathy; N3-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI); N4-complete SCI, and NX-unable to examine], and case-specific modifiers (M1-injuries at risk of nonunion; M2-injuries at risk of instability; M3-patient specific factors; M4-vascular injury).Materials and Methods.Totally, 151 AO Spine members (orthopaedic and neurosurgery) were surveyed globally regarding the severity (zero-low severity to 100-high severity) of each UCIC variable. Primary outcomes were differences in perceived injury severity score (ISS) over various geographic/practice settings, level of experience, and subspecialty.Results.One hundred forty-eight responses were received. There was an increase in median perceived severity as each anatomic region (I-III) progressed from types A to B to C. Neurological status progressed similarly, except N1 and N2 were perceived similarly. Modifier M2 was perceived more severely than M3. There were no differences in ISS among levels of surgeon experience. There were small geographic differences with respondents from North and Central and South America perceiving types IC (P=0.003), IIB (P=0.003), and IIIB (P=0.003) somewhat more severely than other regions. Neurosurgeons perceived types IB (P=0.002) and IIIB (P=0.026) as more severe than orthopaedic spine surgeons.Conclusions.The AO Spine UCIC has overall excellent hierarchical progression in subtype ISS. These findings are consistent across geographic regions, spine subspecialty training and experience levels.
AB - Study Design.Global cross-sectional survey.Objective.To validate the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification (UCIC) across AO geographical regions/practice experience.Summary of Background Data.To create a universally validated scheme with prognostic value, AO Spine established an upper cervical spine injury classification involving three elements: injury morphology (region: I-occipital condyle and craniocervical junction; II-C1 ring and C1-2 joint; III-C2 and C2-3 joint), and (subtype: A-isolated bony injury; B-bony/ligamentous injury; C-displaced/translational injury), neurological status [N0-intact; N1-transient deficit; N2-radiculopathy; N3-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI); N4-complete SCI, and NX-unable to examine], and case-specific modifiers (M1-injuries at risk of nonunion; M2-injuries at risk of instability; M3-patient specific factors; M4-vascular injury).Materials and Methods.Totally, 151 AO Spine members (orthopaedic and neurosurgery) were surveyed globally regarding the severity (zero-low severity to 100-high severity) of each UCIC variable. Primary outcomes were differences in perceived injury severity score (ISS) over various geographic/practice settings, level of experience, and subspecialty.Results.One hundred forty-eight responses were received. There was an increase in median perceived severity as each anatomic region (I-III) progressed from types A to B to C. Neurological status progressed similarly, except N1 and N2 were perceived similarly. Modifier M2 was perceived more severely than M3. There were no differences in ISS among levels of surgeon experience. There were small geographic differences with respondents from North and Central and South America perceiving types IC (P=0.003), IIB (P=0.003), and IIIB (P=0.003) somewhat more severely than other regions. Neurosurgeons perceived types IB (P=0.002) and IIIB (P=0.026) as more severe than orthopaedic spine surgeons.Conclusions.The AO Spine UCIC has overall excellent hierarchical progression in subtype ISS. These findings are consistent across geographic regions, spine subspecialty training and experience levels.
KW - AO Spine
KW - Global
KW - Hierarchical
KW - Injury severity score
KW - Upper cervical spine injury classification
KW - Validation
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pmu_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001513827400006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005297
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005297
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39960095
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 50
SP - 956
EP - 964
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 14
ER -