Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures

  • Julius Watrinet
  • , Philipp Blum
  • , Michael Maier
  • , Steffen Klingbeil
  • , Stephan Regenbogen
  • , Peter Augat (Co-author)
  • , Rolf Schipp
  • , Wolfgang Reng

Research output: Contribution to journalOriginal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are a rare condition that affects about 1% of cases. Known risk factors include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone density, as well as surgical technique and prosthesis design. The purpose of the study was to determine if undersizing of the tibial component in relation to the femoral component increases the risk of tibial periprosthetic fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 6-year-period 1542 patients with cemented (n = 363) and uncemented (n = 1179) medial UKA were retrospectively evaluated. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were identified and classified, and epidemiologic data were documented at follow-up. Undersizing was defined as a smaller tibial component compared to the femoral implant. The association of potential risk factors for TPF with the incidence of TPF was investigated with binominal logistic regression.

RESULTS: Fourteen patients (0.9%) suffered from TPF at a median of 1 month after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 5.9 ± 1.7 years. Fractures were more common in cases with undersized tibial components [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p < 0.05]. Furthermore, older age (OR 1.1, p < 0.05) and female sex (OR 6.5, p < 0.05) were identified as significant risk factors, while BMI (p = 0.8) and cemented implantation (p = 0.2) had no effect on fracture rate. Revision surgery included open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS: Undersizing of implant sizes in UKA increases the risk for TPF especially in patients with small tibial implants. Therefore, mismatched implants should be avoided for UKA particularly when risk factors like obesity, older age, or female gender are present. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were successfully treated by open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1353-1359
Number of pages7
JournalARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
Volume144
Issue number3
Early online date12 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint/surgery
  • Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery
  • Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tibia/surgery
  • Tibial Fractures/etiology
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this