Superior outcomes of total hip arthroplasty without prior lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Riccardo Giai Via, Filippo Migliorini, Francesco Bosco, Francesco Onorato, Davide Carlo Secco, Fortunato Giustra, Alessandro Dario Lavia, Matteo Giachino, Alessandro Massè

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: The number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery after previous lumbar arthrodesis (LA) is rising. Literature suggests that LA may significantly impact pelvic biomechanics and potentially compromise the success of prosthetic hip replacement. This study aims to evaluate complication rates, dislocation rates, and revision rates in patients with prior LA undergoing THA surgery compared to those undergoing THA surgery without prior LA.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A PICOS template was developed to ensure a structured approach. The search for relevant studies was performed across five databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane. The selected articles were evaluated based on the Levels of Evidence (LoE) criteria. The Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was employed to analyze the retrospective studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). For the outcomes that allowed for a meta-analysis performed using R software, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: The final analysis included seventeen studies comprising a total of 3,139,164 cases of THA. Among these cases, 3,081,137 underwent THA surgery alone, while 58,027 patients underwent THA with a previous LA. The study investigated various factors, including dislocation rates, revision rates, and complication, as well as the surgical approach and type of implant used, for both the THA-only group and the group of patients who underwent THA with prior LA. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for all variables studied, favoring the group of patients who underwent THA alone without prior LA.

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant superiority in all analyzed outcomes for patients who underwent THA-only without prior LA. Specifically, patients with isolated THA implants experienced significantly lower incidences of THA dislocation, wound complications, periprosthetic joint infection, revision, and mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)699-711
Number of pages13
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
  • Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
  • Postoperative Complications/etiology
  • Arthrodesis/adverse effects
  • Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Hip Dislocation/etiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Superior outcomes of total hip arthroplasty without prior lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this