Prognostic impact of small size sutureless prostheses: results for 241 patients from an international registry

Giuseppe Santarpino* (First author), Roberto Lorusso, Giovanni Concistre, Jose Cuenca Castillo, Vincenzo Argano, Alistair Royse, Angelo Lucas Nobre, Patrick Parrino, Gianluigi Bisleri, Max Baghai, Theodor Fischlein (Co-author), Giovanni Troise, Generoso Mastrogiovanni, Raphael Fontaine, Davide Pacini, Giuseppe Minniti, Aniello Pappalardo, George Chad Hughes, Philippe Noirhomme, Jean-Philippe GrimaudMaximilian Scherner, Ignacio Munoz, George Asimakopoulos, Antony Walker, Daniela Zakova, Michele Torella, Giorgio Vigano, Mark Connolly, Christian Dinges (Co-author), Pierre Corbi, Loris Salvador, Mauro Rinaldi, Luis Maroto, David Heimansohn, Basel Ramlawi, Mattia Glauber, Jlenia D'Agnano, Valeria Cosco, Veronica D'Anna, Marco Solinas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalOriginal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment of aortic valve disease in small annuli remains a debated topic in terms of prosthetic choice - biological or mechanical - and risk of patient prosthesis mismatch.MethodsThe clinical data of the 241 patients who received a small size sutureless prosthesis from the Sorin Universal REgistry on Aortic Valve Replacement (SURE-AVR) (NCT02679404) were analysed at 30 days and at follow-up. The mean age was 75.5 +/- 7.8 years (89.2% female); the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 4.2 +/- 3.2%, and the preoperative NYHA class II or III score was 83.8%. A minimally invasive approach was performed in 52.7% of patients; concomitant procedures were performed in 27.8% of patients. Similar aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were observed in the overall isolated cohort and the isolated minimally invasive cohort. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 2.4 +/- 2.0 days and the total length of stay was 10.3 +/- 6.1 days.ResultsThree deaths were recorded at 30 days (1.2%), 2 for noncardiac causes. One patient experienced a myocardial infarction (0.4%) and 2 a nondisabling stroke (0.8%). 2 patients showed intraprosthetic leakage >= 2 and one patient para-prosthetic leakage >= 2; of these, one patient required reoperation with prosthesis removal. 4.1% of patients required a pacemaker implant. At a maximum follow-up of 8.1 years, 10 cardiovascular deaths, 4 valve related reinterventions (3 structural valve deterioration (SVD) requiring TAVI Valve-in-Valve, 1 endocarditis) occurred.ConclusionsWith their good clinical outcomes, sutureless prostheses represent a good alternative for patients with small annuli, who are at high risk for annular enlargement and anticoagulant therapy.Trial registrationStudy number 587/2015.
Original languageEnglish
Article number313
Number of pages8
JournalJOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Biological heart prosthesis
  • Follow-up outcome
  • Patient-prosthesis mismatch
  • Sutureless aortic valve

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic impact of small size sutureless prostheses: results for 241 patients from an international registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this