TY - JOUR
T1 - New Trends, Advantages and Disadvantages in Anticoagulation and Coating Methods Used in Extracorporeal Life Support Devices
AU - Willers, Anne
AU - Arens, Jutta
AU - Mariani, Silvia
AU - Pels, Helena
AU - Maessen, Jos G
AU - Hackeng, Tilman M
AU - Lorusso, Roberto
AU - Swol, Justyna
N1 - Swol: Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Ernst-Nathan Str. 1, 90419 Nuremberg, German
PY - 2021/8/12
Y1 - 2021/8/12
N2 - The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices has significantly increased in the last decades. Despite medical and technological advancements, a main challenge in the ECLS field remains the complex interaction between the human body, blood, and artificial materials. Indeed, blood exposure to artificial surfaces generates an unbalanced activation of the coagulation cascade, leading to hemorrhagic and thrombotic events. Over time, several anticoagulation and coatings methods have been introduced to address this problem. This narrative review summarizes trends, advantages, and disadvantages of anticoagulation and coating methods used in the ECLS field. Evidence was collected through a PubMed search and reference scanning. A group of experts was convened to openly discuss the retrieved references. Clinical practice in ECLS is still based on the large use of unfractionated heparin and, as an alternative in case of contraindications, nafamostat mesilate, bivalirudin, and argatroban. Other anticoagulation methods are under investigation, but none is about to enter the clinical routine. From an engineering point of view, material modifications have focused on commercially available biomimetic and biopassive surfaces and on the development of endothelialized surfaces. Biocompatible and bio-hybrid materials not requiring combined systemic anticoagulation should be the future goal, but intense efforts are still required to fulfill this purpose.
AB - The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices has significantly increased in the last decades. Despite medical and technological advancements, a main challenge in the ECLS field remains the complex interaction between the human body, blood, and artificial materials. Indeed, blood exposure to artificial surfaces generates an unbalanced activation of the coagulation cascade, leading to hemorrhagic and thrombotic events. Over time, several anticoagulation and coatings methods have been introduced to address this problem. This narrative review summarizes trends, advantages, and disadvantages of anticoagulation and coating methods used in the ECLS field. Evidence was collected through a PubMed search and reference scanning. A group of experts was convened to openly discuss the retrieved references. Clinical practice in ECLS is still based on the large use of unfractionated heparin and, as an alternative in case of contraindications, nafamostat mesilate, bivalirudin, and argatroban. Other anticoagulation methods are under investigation, but none is about to enter the clinical routine. From an engineering point of view, material modifications have focused on commercially available biomimetic and biopassive surfaces and on the development of endothelialized surfaces. Biocompatible and bio-hybrid materials not requiring combined systemic anticoagulation should be the future goal, but intense efforts are still required to fulfill this purpose.
KW - HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA
KW - MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN
KW - MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION
KW - LUNG ASSIST
KW - LEPIRUDIN ANTICOAGULATION
KW - NAFAMOSTAT MESILATE
KW - NITRIC-OXIDE
KW - ARGATROBAN
KW - ACTIVATION
KW - CIRCUIT
U2 - 10.3390/membranes11080617
DO - 10.3390/membranes11080617
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34436380
SN - 2077-0375
VL - 11
JO - MEMBRANES
JF - MEMBRANES
IS - 8
ER -