How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.

Roland Beisteiner; Nicolaus Klinger; Ilse Höllinger; Jakob Rath; Susanne Gruber; Thomas Steinkellner; Thomas Foki; Alexander Geissler

doi:10.1002/hbm.20990

How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.

Roland Beisteiner, Nicolaus Klinger, Ilse Höllinger, Jakob Rath, Susanne Gruber, Thomas Steinkellner, Thomas Foki, Alexander Geissler

Department of Internal Medicine II - Division of Cardiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Original Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Web of Science)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1951-1966
Journal	HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume	31
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20990
Publication status	Published - 2010

Keywords

MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
AUTOMATED IMAGE REGISTRATION
FUNCTIONAL MRI
WORKING-MEMORY
SPATIAL NORMALIZATION
HIPPOCAMPAL ACTIVATION
LANGUAGE DOMINANCE
LATERALIZATION
VARIABILITY
HYPERACTIVATION

Access to Document

10.1002/hbm.20990

Cite this

@article{e630e541d66142bcb934cd66a487e30c,

title = "How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.",

keywords = "MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT, AUTOMATED IMAGE REGISTRATION, FUNCTIONAL MRI, WORKING-MEMORY, SPATIAL NORMALIZATION, HIPPOCAMPAL ACTIVATION, LANGUAGE DOMINANCE, LATERALIZATION, VARIABILITY, HYPERACTIVATION",

author = "Roland Beisteiner and Nicolaus Klinger and Ilse H{\"o}llinger and Jakob Rath and Susanne Gruber and Thomas Steinkellner and Thomas Foki and Alexander Geissler",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1002/hbm.20990",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "1951--1966",

journal = "HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING ",

issn = "1065-9471",

number = "12",

}

Beisteiner, R, Klinger, N, Höllinger, I, Rath, J, Gruber, S, Steinkellner, T, Foki, T & Geissler, A 2010, 'How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.', HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1951-1966. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20990

How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe. / Beisteiner, Roland; Klinger, Nicolaus; Höllinger, Ilse et al.
In: HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING , Vol. 31, No. 12, 2010, p. 1951-1966.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Original Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.

AU - Beisteiner, Roland

AU - Klinger, Nicolaus

AU - Höllinger, Ilse

AU - Rath, Jakob

AU - Gruber, Susanne

AU - Steinkellner, Thomas

AU - Foki, Thomas

AU - Geissler, Alexander

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

KW - MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

KW - AUTOMATED IMAGE REGISTRATION

KW - FUNCTIONAL MRI

KW - WORKING-MEMORY

KW - SPATIAL NORMALIZATION

KW - HIPPOCAMPAL ACTIVATION

KW - LANGUAGE DOMINANCE

KW - LATERALIZATION

KW - VARIABILITY

KW - HYPERACTIVATION

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.20990

DO - 10.1002/hbm.20990

M3 - Original Article

C2 - 20205247

SN - 1065-9471

VL - 31

SP - 1951

EP - 1966

JO - HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING

JF - HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING

IS - 12

ER -