TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the limit of image resolution for human expert classification of vascular ultrasound images in giant cell arteritis and healthy subjects
T2 - the GCA-US-AI project
AU - Bauer, Claus-Juergen
AU - Chrysidis, Stavros
AU - Dejaco, Christian
AU - Koster, Matthew J
AU - Kohler, Minna J
AU - Monti, Sara
AU - Schmidt, Wolfgang A
AU - Mukhtyar, Chetan B
AU - Karakostas, Pantelis
AU - Milchert, Marcin
AU - Ponte, Cristina
AU - Duftner, Christina
AU - de Miguel, Eugenio
AU - Hocevar, Alojzija
AU - Iagnocco, Annamaria
AU - Terslev, Lene
AU - Døhn, Uffe Møller
AU - Nielsen, Berit Dalsgaard
AU - Juche, Aaron
AU - Seitz, Luca
AU - Keller, Kresten Krarup
AU - Karalilova, Rositsa
AU - Daikeler, Thomas
AU - Mackie, Sarah Louise
AU - Torralba, Karina
AU - van der Geest, Kornelis S M
AU - Boumans, Dennis
AU - Bosch, Philipp
AU - Tomelleri, Alessandro
AU - Aschwanden, Markus
AU - Kermani, Tanaz A
AU - Diamantopoulos, Andreas
AU - Fredberg, Ulrich
AU - Inanc, Nevsun
AU - Petzinna, Simon M
AU - Albarqouni, Shadi
AU - Behning, Charlotte
AU - Schäfer, Valentin Sebastian
N1 - Lehr-KH Hospital of Bruneck (ASAA-SABES), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsius Medical University, Bruneck, Italy
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Objectives: Prompt diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with ultrasound is crucial for preventing severe ocular and other complications, yet expertise in ultrasound performance is scarce. The development of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based assistant that facilitates ultrasound image classification and helps to diagnose GCA early promises to close the existing gap. In the projection of the planned AI, this study investigates the minimum image resolution required for human experts to reliably classify ultrasound images of arteries commonly affected by GCA for the presence or absence of GCA. Methods: Thirty-one international experts in GCA ultrasonography participated in a web-based exercise. They were asked to classify 10 ultrasound images for each of 5 vascular segments as GCA, normal, or not able to classify. The following segments were assessed: (1) superficial common temporal artery, (2) its frontal and (3) parietal branches (all in transverse view), (4) axillary artery in transverse view, and 5) axillary artery in longitudinal view. Identical images were shown at different resolutions, namely 32 x 32, 64 x 64, 128 x 128, 224 x 224, and 512 x 512 pixels, thereby resulting in a total of 250 images to be classified by every study participant. Results: Classification performance improved with increasing resolution up to a threshold, plateauing at 224 x 224 pixels. At 224 x 224 pixels, the overall classification sensitivity was 0.767 (95% CI, 0.737-0.796), and specificity was 0.862 (95% CI, 0.831-0.888). Conclusions: A resolution of 224 x 224 pixels ensures reliable human expert classification and aligns with the input requirements of many common AI-based architectures. Thus, the results of this study substantially guide projected AI development.
AB - Objectives: Prompt diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with ultrasound is crucial for preventing severe ocular and other complications, yet expertise in ultrasound performance is scarce. The development of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based assistant that facilitates ultrasound image classification and helps to diagnose GCA early promises to close the existing gap. In the projection of the planned AI, this study investigates the minimum image resolution required for human experts to reliably classify ultrasound images of arteries commonly affected by GCA for the presence or absence of GCA. Methods: Thirty-one international experts in GCA ultrasonography participated in a web-based exercise. They were asked to classify 10 ultrasound images for each of 5 vascular segments as GCA, normal, or not able to classify. The following segments were assessed: (1) superficial common temporal artery, (2) its frontal and (3) parietal branches (all in transverse view), (4) axillary artery in transverse view, and 5) axillary artery in longitudinal view. Identical images were shown at different resolutions, namely 32 x 32, 64 x 64, 128 x 128, 224 x 224, and 512 x 512 pixels, thereby resulting in a total of 250 images to be classified by every study participant. Results: Classification performance improved with increasing resolution up to a threshold, plateauing at 224 x 224 pixels. At 224 x 224 pixels, the overall classification sensitivity was 0.767 (95% CI, 0.737-0.796), and specificity was 0.862 (95% CI, 0.831-0.888). Conclusions: A resolution of 224 x 224 pixels ensures reliable human expert classification and aligns with the input requirements of many common AI-based architectures. Thus, the results of this study substantially guide projected AI development.
KW - Humans
KW - Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnostic imaging
KW - Ultrasonography/methods
KW - Temporal Arteries/diagnostic imaging
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Axillary Artery/diagnostic imaging
KW - Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Male
KW - Female
U2 - 10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.010
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 40514330
SN - 0003-4967
VL - 84
SP - 1528
EP - 1537
JO - ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
JF - ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
IS - 9
ER -