TY - JOUR
T1 - Entwicklung und Evaluation des OF-Pelvis-Scores bei osteoporotischen Beckenringfrakturen – retrospektive Beurteilung der Therapieempfehlung anhand von 107 Patienten
AU - Spiegl, Ulrich Josef Albert
AU - Schnake, Klaus J
AU - Scheyerer, Max J
AU - Mendel, Thomas
AU - Osterhoff, Georg
AU - Sprengel, Kai
AU - Bäumlein, Martin
AU - Behr, Lars
AU - Franck, Alexander
AU - Gercek, Erol
AU - Grüninger, Sebastian
AU - Hartung, Philipp
AU - Hauck, Stefan
AU - Jacobs, Cornelius
AU - Katscher, Sebastian
AU - Klauke, Friederike
AU - Liepold, Katja
AU - Müller, Christian W
AU - Müller, Michael
AU - Piltz, Stefan
AU - Pätzold, Robert
AU - Riehle, Marion
AU - Schmeiser, Gregor
AU - Verheyden, Akhil P
AU - Zimmermann, Volker
AU - Ullrich, Bernhard
AU - AG Osteoporotische Frakturen der Sektion Wirbelsäule der DGOU
N1 - Thieme. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/10/2
Y1 - 2024/10/2
N2 - The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.
AB - The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.
U2 - 10.1055/a-2385-1747
DO - 10.1055/a-2385-1747
M3 - Originalarbeit
C2 - 39357846
SN - 1864-6697
JO - ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE
JF - ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE
ER -