EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications

Anna Carobene, Janne Cadamuro (Co-author), Glynis Frans, Hanoch Goldshmidt, Zeljiko Debeljak, Sander De Bruyne, William van Doorn, Elias Johannes, Habib Ozdemir, Salomon Martin Perez, Helena Lame, Alexander Tolios, Federico Cabitza, Andrea Padoan, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence

Research output: Contribution to journalOriginal Articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Web of Science)

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into laboratory medicine shows promise for advancing diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-support tools; however, routine clinical implementation remains limited and heterogeneous. Laboratory data presents unique methodological and semantic complexities - method dependency, analyte-specific variation, and contextual sensitivity-not adequately addressed by general-purpose AI reporting guidelines. To bridge this gap, the EFLM Committee on Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence (C-AI) proposes an expanded checklist to support assessment of requirements and recommendations for the development of AI/ML models based on laboratory data. Building upon the widely adopted ChAMAI checklist (Checklist for assessment of medical AI), our proposal introduces six additional items, each grounded in the CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) framework and tailored to the specificities of laboratory workflows. These extensions address: (1) explicit documentation of laboratory data characteristics; (2) consideration of biological and analytical variability; (3) the role of metadata and peridata in contextualizing results; (4) analyte harmonization and standardization practices; (5) rigorous external validation with attention to dataset similarity; and (6) the implementation of FAIR data principles for transparency and reproducibility. Together, these recommendations aim to foster robust, interpretable, and generalizable AI systems that are fit for deployment in clinical laboratory settings. By incorporating these laboratory-aware considerations into model development pipelines, researchers and practitioners can enhance both the scientific rigor and practical applicability of AI tools. We advocate for the adoption of this extended checklist by developers, reviewers, and regulators to promote trustworthy and reproducible AI in laboratory medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalCLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Early online dateSept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Checklist
  • Data variability
  • Laboratory medicine
  • Machine learning
  • Model validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this