TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical validation of fully automated cartilage transverse relaxation time (T2) and thickness analysis using quantitative DESS magnetic resonance imaging
AU - Wirth, Wolfgang
AU - Herger, Simon
AU - Maschek, Susanne
AU - Wisser, Anna
AU - Bieri, Oliver
AU - Eckstein, Felix
AU - Mündermann, Annegret
N1 - Wirt, Wisser, Eckstein: Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Center
for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - ObjectiveTo clinically validate a fully automated cartilage segmentation technique from quantitative double-echo steady-state (qDESS) MRI supporting simultaneous estimation of cartilage T2 and morphology. Here, we test whether laminar (superficial and deep layer) T2 results from convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentations are consistent with those from manual expert segmentations.Materials and methodsThe 3D qDESS sequence was acquired using 3 T MRI (resolution: 0.3125 x 0.3125x1.5 mm) in both knees of 37 subjects with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and 48 uninjured controls. Automated femorotibial cartilage (FTJ) segmentation was based on a 2D U-Net. Laminar T2 and cartilage thickness across the FTJ) were compared between ACL-injured and contralateral knees, and between ACL-injured and control knees. Effect sizes of these differences were measured using non-parametric Cohen's d (dn-p).ResultSignificant differences were observed only in deep T2, with longer T2 in ACL-injured knees than in contralateral and healthy control knees in most of the comparisons and with similar effect sizes for automated and manual segmentations (range dn-p automated/manual: 0.58-1.04/0.58-0.74). No significant differences were observed in superficial T2 or cartilage thickness.DiscussionFully-automated, CNN-based analysis showed similar sensitivity to differences in laminar cartilage T2 as manual segmentation, allowing automated qDESS-analyses to be applied to larger datasets.
AB - ObjectiveTo clinically validate a fully automated cartilage segmentation technique from quantitative double-echo steady-state (qDESS) MRI supporting simultaneous estimation of cartilage T2 and morphology. Here, we test whether laminar (superficial and deep layer) T2 results from convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentations are consistent with those from manual expert segmentations.Materials and methodsThe 3D qDESS sequence was acquired using 3 T MRI (resolution: 0.3125 x 0.3125x1.5 mm) in both knees of 37 subjects with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and 48 uninjured controls. Automated femorotibial cartilage (FTJ) segmentation was based on a 2D U-Net. Laminar T2 and cartilage thickness across the FTJ) were compared between ACL-injured and contralateral knees, and between ACL-injured and control knees. Effect sizes of these differences were measured using non-parametric Cohen's d (dn-p).ResultSignificant differences were observed only in deep T2, with longer T2 in ACL-injured knees than in contralateral and healthy control knees in most of the comparisons and with similar effect sizes for automated and manual segmentations (range dn-p automated/manual: 0.58-1.04/0.58-0.74). No significant differences were observed in superficial T2 or cartilage thickness.DiscussionFully-automated, CNN-based analysis showed similar sensitivity to differences in laminar cartilage T2 as manual segmentation, allowing automated qDESS-analyses to be applied to larger datasets.
U2 - 10.1007/s10334-025-01227-5
DO - 10.1007/s10334-025-01227-5
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39992574
SN - 0968-5243
VL - 38
SP - 285
EP - 297
JO - MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
JF - MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
IS - 2
ER -