TY - JOUR
T1 - A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols
AU - Nydahl, Peter
AU - Liu, Keibun
AU - Bellelli, Giuseppe
AU - Benbenishty, Julie
AU - van den Boogaard, Mark
AU - Caplan, Gideon
AU - Chung, Chi Ryang
AU - Elhadi, Muhammed
AU - Gurjar, Mohan
AU - Heras-La Calle, Gabi
AU - Hoffmann, Magdalena
AU - Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen
AU - Krewulak, Karla
AU - Mailhot, Tanya
AU - Morandi, Alessandro
AU - Nawa, Ricardo Kenji
AU - Oh, Esther S.
AU - Collet, Marie O.
AU - Paulino, Maria Carolina
AU - Lindroth, Heidi
AU - von Haken, Rebecca
AU - WDAD Study Grp
N1 - Nydahl: Institute of Nursing Science and Development, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2024/7/2
Y1 - 2024/7/2
N2 - Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols.Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023.Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers.Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions.Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.
AB - Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols.Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023.Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers.Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions.Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.
KW - Assessments
KW - Delirium
KW - Encephalopathy
KW - Older people
KW - Patient safety
KW - Protocols
KW - Quality improvement
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pmu_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001260318000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afae129
DO - 10.1093/ageing/afae129
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 38952186
SN - 0002-0729
VL - 53
JO - Age and Ageing
JF - Age and Ageing
IS - 7
M1 - afae129
ER -