TY - JOUR
T1 - Whole body vibration for chronic patellar tendinopathy
T2 - A randomized equivalence trial
AU - Rieder, Florian
AU - Wiesinger, Hans-Peter
AU - Herfert, Jürgen
AU - Lampl, Kathrin
AU - Hecht, Stefan
AU - Niebauer, Josef
AU - Maffulli, Nicola
AU - Kösters, Alexander
AU - Müller, Erich
AU - Seynnes, Olivier R
N1 - Rieder, Herfert, Lampl, Niebauer: Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. Hecht: Institute of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. Niebauer: Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Wiesinger: Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris-Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Purpose: Whole body vibration (WBV) triggers anabolic responses in various tissues, including tendons, without requiring high force production. In this waitlist-controlled equivalence trial, we tested its clinical effectiveness as an alternative treatment for patellar tendinopathy against conventional heavy slow resistance training (HSR). Methods: Thirty-nine patients were randomized to either 3 months of WBV training (n = 13), HSR training (n = 11), or a waitlist control (WLC) group (n = 15). In a partly cross-over design, 14 patients of the WLC group were redistributed to one of the two intervention groups (5 in WBV, 9 in HSR). Pre- and post-intervention testing included pain assessments (VAS), functional limitations (VISA-P), knee extension strength and tendon morphological, mechanical and material properties. Follow-up measurements (VAS, VISA-P) were performed in the WBV and HSR groups 6 months after the intervention. Results: Comparisons with the WLC group revealed significant improvements in VISA-P and VAS scores after HSR (41%, p = 003; 54%, p = 0.005) and WBV (22%, p = 0.022; 56%, p = 0.031) training. These improvements continued until follow-up (HSR: 43%, 56%; WBV: 24%, 37%). Pre-post improvements in VAS scores were equivalent between WBV and HSR groups but inconclusive for the VISA-P score and all pre-test to follow up comparisons. The mid-tendon cross-sectional area was significantly reduced after WBV (-5.7%, p = 0.004) and HSR (-3.0%, p = 0.004) training compared to WLC although the equivalence test between interventions was inconclusive. Conclusion: Whole body vibration improved symptoms typically associated with patellar tendinopathy. This type of intervention is as effective as HSR against maximum pain, although equivalence could not be confirmed for other variables. The beneficial responses to WBV and HSR treatments persisted for 6 months after the end of the intervention. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do, identifier DRKS00011338.
AB - Purpose: Whole body vibration (WBV) triggers anabolic responses in various tissues, including tendons, without requiring high force production. In this waitlist-controlled equivalence trial, we tested its clinical effectiveness as an alternative treatment for patellar tendinopathy against conventional heavy slow resistance training (HSR). Methods: Thirty-nine patients were randomized to either 3 months of WBV training (n = 13), HSR training (n = 11), or a waitlist control (WLC) group (n = 15). In a partly cross-over design, 14 patients of the WLC group were redistributed to one of the two intervention groups (5 in WBV, 9 in HSR). Pre- and post-intervention testing included pain assessments (VAS), functional limitations (VISA-P), knee extension strength and tendon morphological, mechanical and material properties. Follow-up measurements (VAS, VISA-P) were performed in the WBV and HSR groups 6 months after the intervention. Results: Comparisons with the WLC group revealed significant improvements in VISA-P and VAS scores after HSR (41%, p = 003; 54%, p = 0.005) and WBV (22%, p = 0.022; 56%, p = 0.031) training. These improvements continued until follow-up (HSR: 43%, 56%; WBV: 24%, 37%). Pre-post improvements in VAS scores were equivalent between WBV and HSR groups but inconclusive for the VISA-P score and all pre-test to follow up comparisons. The mid-tendon cross-sectional area was significantly reduced after WBV (-5.7%, p = 0.004) and HSR (-3.0%, p = 0.004) training compared to WLC although the equivalence test between interventions was inconclusive. Conclusion: Whole body vibration improved symptoms typically associated with patellar tendinopathy. This type of intervention is as effective as HSR against maximum pain, although equivalence could not be confirmed for other variables. The beneficial responses to WBV and HSR treatments persisted for 6 months after the end of the intervention. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do, identifier DRKS00011338.
KW - TENDON MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
KW - ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY
KW - PAIN
KW - HYPERTROPHY
KW - NEOVASCULARIZATION
KW - APONEUROSIS
KW - EXTENSION
KW - STRENGTH
KW - EXERCISE
KW - WOMEN
U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2022.1017931
DO - 10.3389/fphys.2022.1017931
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 36338477
SN - 1664-042X
VL - 13
SP - 1017931
JO - FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
JF - FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
ER -