TY - JOUR
T1 - The sensory input, not the motor output, defines blink reflex conditioning
AU - Kofler, Markus
AU - Valls-Sole, Josep
AU - Thurner, Michael
AU - Pucks-Faes, Elke
AU - Versace, Viviana
N1 - Versace: Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA), Vipiteno-Sterzing, Italy; Department of Neurology, Neurocritical Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Objective: Blink reflexes following supraorbital nerve (SON) stimulation are typically modulated by conditioning stimuli (CS) to the index finger (D2) (low-intensity, prepulse inhibition paradigm) or SON (same intensity, paired-pulse paradigm). We aimed to disentangle whether CS-intensity or CS-induced motor responses define blink reflex modulation. Methods: In 35 subjects, test SON stimuli (8 times sensory threshold, 8 x ST) were applied either alone or following CS. In experiment 1, CS were delivered to D2 with low (2 x ST) or high intensity (inducing a somatosensory blink reflex). In experiment 2, CS were applied to SON with low (<2 x ST) or test intensity. Test blink reflex size was correlated to CS-intensity and to CS-induced motor response size. Relative strength of their influence was determined in regression analyses. Results: Test blink reflex size showed higher inverse correlation to CS-intensity than to CS-induced motor response size for both CS delivered to D2 or SON. Regression analyses confirmed a significantly higher relative strength of CS-intensity than of CS-induced motor response size. Conclusions: The sensory input of CS, rather than CS-induced motor output, defines subsequent blink reflex modulation.
AB - Objective: Blink reflexes following supraorbital nerve (SON) stimulation are typically modulated by conditioning stimuli (CS) to the index finger (D2) (low-intensity, prepulse inhibition paradigm) or SON (same intensity, paired-pulse paradigm). We aimed to disentangle whether CS-intensity or CS-induced motor responses define blink reflex modulation. Methods: In 35 subjects, test SON stimuli (8 times sensory threshold, 8 x ST) were applied either alone or following CS. In experiment 1, CS were delivered to D2 with low (2 x ST) or high intensity (inducing a somatosensory blink reflex). In experiment 2, CS were applied to SON with low (<2 x ST) or test intensity. Test blink reflex size was correlated to CS-intensity and to CS-induced motor response size. Relative strength of their influence was determined in regression analyses. Results: Test blink reflex size showed higher inverse correlation to CS-intensity than to CS-induced motor response size for both CS delivered to D2 or SON. Regression analyses confirmed a significantly higher relative strength of CS-intensity than of CS-induced motor response size. Conclusions: The sensory input of CS, rather than CS-induced motor output, defines subsequent blink reflex modulation.
KW - Blink reflex excitability recovery
KW - Conditioning stimulation
KW - Paired-pulse stimulation
KW - Prepulse inhibition
KW - Trigeminal blink reflex
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pmu_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001367807600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.003
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39581142
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 168
SP - 168
EP - 175
JO - CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
JF - CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
ER -