TY - JOUR
T1 - The Restoration of the Prearthritic Joint Line Does Not Guarantee the Natural Knee Kinematics
T2 - A Gait Analysis Evaluation Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
AU - Salvi, Andrea Giordano
AU - Valpiana, Pieralberto
AU - Innocenti, Bernardo
AU - Ghirardelli, Stefano
AU - Bernardi, Matteo
AU - Petralia, Giuseppe
AU - Aloisi, Giuseppe
AU - Zepeda, Karlos
AU - Schaller, Christian
AU - Indelli, Pier Francesco
N1 - Lehr-KH üdtiroler Sanit€atsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy;
Valpiana, Indelli: Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Institute of Biomechanics, Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Unrestricted kinematic alignment (uKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the theoretical advantage of reproducing patients' constitutional alignment and restoring the pre-arthritic joint line position and obliquity. However, modifications of the original uKA technique have been proposed due to the potential risk of mechanical failure and instability. Given the significant variability in soft tissue behavior within the same bony morphology group, uKA pure knee resurfacing could be occasionally detrimental. This study aimed to kinematically compare the outcomes of uKA TKA with those of a robotic-assisted KA TKA technique based on specific soft-tissue boundaries. Methods: In this retrospective gait analysis study, 24 TKA patients and 12 healthy controls were recruited. Inclusion criteria were a 9-month minimum follow-up from successfully, primary medial-pivot or medially-congruent TKA performed for isolated degenerative joint disease. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned to two surgical groups: A) uKA (#12) and B) robot-assisted (#12), KA (hybridkinematic) with boundaries (+/- 3 degrees from hip-knee-ankle neutral axis) and a slight intercompartmental gap asymmetry (max 2 mm lateral-opening). The gait analysis was performed using instrumented treadmills equipped with 3D cameras. Results: Sagittal knee kinematic data: during the early-stance phase of gait, the uKA group showed a less consistent weight-acceptance phase and a less efficient transition between the first knee-flexion peak and mid-stance-extension plateau with respect to the hybrid-kinematic alignment group. Spatiotemporal and overall gait quality data: no significant differences were found between the two TKA groups regarding walking speed (P = .51) and step length (P = .8534). Control group patients walked more efficiently compared to TKA groups, showing inferior trunk flexion and inferior variation in step length (P < .0001). Conclusions: This study showed that restoring the pre-arthritic joint line, as advocated by surgeons following the uKA philosophy, does not guarantee a closer-to-normal knee kinematics. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
AB - Background: Unrestricted kinematic alignment (uKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the theoretical advantage of reproducing patients' constitutional alignment and restoring the pre-arthritic joint line position and obliquity. However, modifications of the original uKA technique have been proposed due to the potential risk of mechanical failure and instability. Given the significant variability in soft tissue behavior within the same bony morphology group, uKA pure knee resurfacing could be occasionally detrimental. This study aimed to kinematically compare the outcomes of uKA TKA with those of a robotic-assisted KA TKA technique based on specific soft-tissue boundaries. Methods: In this retrospective gait analysis study, 24 TKA patients and 12 healthy controls were recruited. Inclusion criteria were a 9-month minimum follow-up from successfully, primary medial-pivot or medially-congruent TKA performed for isolated degenerative joint disease. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned to two surgical groups: A) uKA (#12) and B) robot-assisted (#12), KA (hybridkinematic) with boundaries (+/- 3 degrees from hip-knee-ankle neutral axis) and a slight intercompartmental gap asymmetry (max 2 mm lateral-opening). The gait analysis was performed using instrumented treadmills equipped with 3D cameras. Results: Sagittal knee kinematic data: during the early-stance phase of gait, the uKA group showed a less consistent weight-acceptance phase and a less efficient transition between the first knee-flexion peak and mid-stance-extension plateau with respect to the hybrid-kinematic alignment group. Spatiotemporal and overall gait quality data: no significant differences were found between the two TKA groups regarding walking speed (P = .51) and step length (P = .8534). Control group patients walked more efficiently compared to TKA groups, showing inferior trunk flexion and inferior variation in step length (P < .0001). Conclusions: This study showed that restoring the pre-arthritic joint line, as advocated by surgeons following the uKA philosophy, does not guarantee a closer-to-normal knee kinematics. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
KW - Alignment
KW - Gait analysis
KW - Kinematic alignment
KW - Medial pivot
KW - Robotics
KW - Tka
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pmu_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001378959400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101586
DO - 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101586
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39717836
SN - 2352-3441
VL - 30
JO - ARTHROPLASTY TODAY
JF - ARTHROPLASTY TODAY
M1 - 101586
ER -