The infraacetabular screw versus the antegrade posterior column screw in acetabulum fractures with posterior column involvement: a biomechanical comparison

Nico Hinz, Dirk Baumeister (Co-Autor/-in), Julius Dehoust, Matthias Münch, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Peter Augat (Co-Autor/-in), Maximilian J Hartel

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftOriginalarbeit (Zeitschrift)Begutachtung

2 Quellenangaben (Web of Science)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, plate osteosynthesis of the anterior column combined with an antegrade posterior column screw is used for fixation of anterior column plus posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) acetabulum fractures. Replacing the posterior column screw with an infraacetabular screw could improve the straightforwardness of acetabulum surgery, as it can be inserted using less invasive approaches, such as the AIP/Stoppa approach, which is a well-established standard approach. However, the biomechanical stability of a plate osteosynthesis combined with an infraacetabular screw instead of an antegrade posterior column screw is unknown.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two osteosynthesis constructs were compared in a synthetic hemipelvis model with an ACPHT fracture: Suprapectineal plate + antegrade posterior column screw (APCS group) vs. suprapectineal plate + infraacetabular screw (IAS group). A single-leg stance test protocol with an additional passive muscle force and a cyclic loading of 32,000 cycles with a maximum effective load of 2400 N was applied. Interfragmentary motion and rotation of the three main fracture lines were measured.

RESULTS: At the posterior hemitransverse fracture line, interfragmentary motion perpendicular to the fracture line (p < 0.001) and shear motion (p < 0.001) and at the high anterior column fracture line, interfragmentary motion longitudinal to the fracture line (p = 0.017) were significantly higher in the IAS group than in the APCS group. On the other hand, interfragmentary motion perpendicular (p = 0.004), longitudinal (p < 0.001) and horizontal to the fracture line (p = 0.004) and shear motion (p < 0.001) were significantly increased at the low anterior column fracture line in the APCS group compared to the IAS group.

CONCLUSIONS: Replacing the antegrade posterior column screw with an infraacetabular screw is not recommendable as it results in an increased interfragmentary motion, especially at the posterior hemitransverse component of an ACPHT fracture.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2573-2582
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
Jahrgang144
Ausgabenummer6
Frühes Online-DatumApr. 2024
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2024

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „The infraacetabular screw versus the antegrade posterior column screw in acetabulum fractures with posterior column involvement: a biomechanical comparison“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren