TY - JOUR
T1 - Landiolol for heart rate control in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (Landi-SEP)
AU - Rehberg, Sebastian
AU - Frank, Sandra
AU - Cerny, Vladimir
AU - Cihlar, Radek
AU - Borgstedt, Rainer
AU - Biancofiore, Gianni
AU - Guarracino, Fabio
AU - Schober, Andreas
AU - Trimmel, Helmut
AU - Pernerstorfer, Thomas
AU - Siebers, Christian
AU - Dostal, Pavel
AU - Morelli, Andrea
AU - Joannidis, Michael
AU - Pretsch, Ingrid
AU - Fuchs, Christian
AU - Rahmel, Tim
AU - Podbregar, Matej
AU - Duliczki, Eva
AU - Tamme, Kadri
AU - Unger, Martin
AU - Sus, Jan
AU - Klade, Christoph
AU - Krejcy, Kurt
AU - Kirchbaumer-Baroian, Nairi
AU - Krumpl, Guenther
AU - Duska, Frantisek
AU - LANDI SEP Study Grp
N1 - Pretsch: Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
PY - 2024/9/19
Y1 - 2024/9/19
N2 - Purpose: Excessive tachycardia in resuscitated septic shock patients can impair hemodynamics and worsen patient outcome. We investigated whether heart rate (HR) control can be achieved without increased vasopressor requirements using the titratable highly selective, ultra-short-acting beta 1-blocker landiolol. Methods: This randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at 20 sites in 7 European countries from 2018 to 2022 and investigated the efficacy and safety of landiolol in adult patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either landiolol along with standard treatment (n = 99) or standard treatment alone (n = 101). The combined primary endpoint was HR response (i.e., HR within the range of 80-94 beats per minute) and its maintenance without increasing vasopressor requirements during the first 24 h after treatment start. Key secondary endpoints were 28-day mortality and adverse events. Results: septic shock patients, 98 received standard treatment combined with landiolol and 98 standard treatment alone. A significantly larger proportion of patients met the combined primary endpoint in the landiolol group than in the control group (39.8% [39/98] vs. 23.5% [23/98]), with a between-group difference of 16.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-28.8%; p = 0.013). There were no statistically significant differences between study groups in tested secondary outcomes and adverse events. Conclusion: The ultra-short-acting beta-blocker landiolol was effective in reducing and maintaining HR without increasing vasopressor requirements after 24 h in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia. There were no differences in adverse events and clinical outcomes such as 28-day mortality vs. standard of care. The results of this study, in the context of previous trials, do not support a treatment strategy of stringent HR reduction (< 95 bpm) in an unselected septic shock population with persistent tachycardia. Further investigations are needed to identify septic shock patient phenotypes that benefit clinically from HR control.
AB - Purpose: Excessive tachycardia in resuscitated septic shock patients can impair hemodynamics and worsen patient outcome. We investigated whether heart rate (HR) control can be achieved without increased vasopressor requirements using the titratable highly selective, ultra-short-acting beta 1-blocker landiolol. Methods: This randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at 20 sites in 7 European countries from 2018 to 2022 and investigated the efficacy and safety of landiolol in adult patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either landiolol along with standard treatment (n = 99) or standard treatment alone (n = 101). The combined primary endpoint was HR response (i.e., HR within the range of 80-94 beats per minute) and its maintenance without increasing vasopressor requirements during the first 24 h after treatment start. Key secondary endpoints were 28-day mortality and adverse events. Results: septic shock patients, 98 received standard treatment combined with landiolol and 98 standard treatment alone. A significantly larger proportion of patients met the combined primary endpoint in the landiolol group than in the control group (39.8% [39/98] vs. 23.5% [23/98]), with a between-group difference of 16.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-28.8%; p = 0.013). There were no statistically significant differences between study groups in tested secondary outcomes and adverse events. Conclusion: The ultra-short-acting beta-blocker landiolol was effective in reducing and maintaining HR without increasing vasopressor requirements after 24 h in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia. There were no differences in adverse events and clinical outcomes such as 28-day mortality vs. standard of care. The results of this study, in the context of previous trials, do not support a treatment strategy of stringent HR reduction (< 95 bpm) in an unselected septic shock population with persistent tachycardia. Further investigations are needed to identify septic shock patient phenotypes that benefit clinically from HR control.
KW - Heart rate control
KW - Landiolol
KW - Persistent tachycardia
KW - Sepsis
KW - Septic shock
KW - Ultra-short-acting beta-blocker
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pmu_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001316729700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-024-07587-1
DO - 10.1007/s00134-024-07587-1
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39297945
SN - 0342-4642
JO - INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
JF - INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ER -