Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

H Christoph Klingler; Mesut Remzi; Günter Janetschek; Christian Kratzik; Michael J Marberger

doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

H Christoph Klingler, Mesut Remzi, Günter Janetschek (Co-Autor/-in), Christian Kratzik, Michael J Marberger

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Originalarbeit › Begutachtung

153 Quellenangaben (Web of Science)

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	340-345
Fachzeitschrift	EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Jahrgang	44
Ausgabenummer	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 2003

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

Dieses zitieren

Klingler, H. C., Remzi, M., Janetschek, G., Kratzik, C., & Marberger, M. J. (2003). Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. EUROPEAN UROLOGY , 44(3), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

Klingler, H Christoph ; Remzi, Mesut ; Janetschek, Günter et al. / Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. in: EUROPEAN UROLOGY 2003 ; Jahrgang 44, Nr. 3. S. 340-345.

@article{70d02c2f89534b0bb65aebff9663c71c,

title = "Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.",

keywords = "DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY, CROSSING VESSELS, MULTICENTER",

author = "Klingler, {H Christoph} and Mesut Remzi and G{\"u}nter Janetschek and Christian Kratzik and Marberger, {Michael J}",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "340--345",

journal = "EUROPEAN UROLOGY ",

issn = "0302-2838",

publisher = "Elsevier ",

number = "3",

}

Klingler, HC, Remzi, M, Janetschek, G, Kratzik, C & Marberger, MJ 2003, 'Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.', EUROPEAN UROLOGY , Jg. 44, Nr. 3, S. 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. / Klingler, H Christoph; Remzi, Mesut; Janetschek, Günter (Co-Autor/-in) et al.
in: EUROPEAN UROLOGY , Jahrgang 44, Nr. 3, 2003, S. 340-345.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Originalarbeit › Begutachtung

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

AU - Klingler, H Christoph

AU - Remzi, Mesut

AU - Janetschek, Günter

AU - Kratzik, Christian

AU - Marberger, Michael J

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

KW - DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY

KW - CROSSING VESSELS

KW - MULTICENTER

U2 - 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

DO - 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5

M3 - Original Article

C2 - 12932933

SN - 0302-2838

VL - 44

SP - 340

EP - 345

JO - EUROPEAN UROLOGY

JF - EUROPEAN UROLOGY

IS - 3

ER -

Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. EUROPEAN UROLOGY . 2003;44(3):340-345. doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5