TY - JOUR
T1 - Charcot on screen
T2 - portrayals and preconceptions of a medical icon (Article type: history of Neurology)
AU - Brigo, Francesco
N1 - Innovation, Research and Teaching Service, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Azienda Sanitaria dell’Alto Adige, Via A. Volta, 13, Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Italy
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - This article explores the evolving cinematic legacy of Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893), focusing on how his image has been interpreted across a range of films. The study examines portrayals ofCharcot in Freud: The Secret Passion (1962, directed by John Huston), Der junge Freud (1976, Axel Corti), Augustine (2003, Jean-Claude Monod and Jean-Christophe Valtat), Augustine (2012, Alice Winocour), and Le Bal des folles (2021, M & eacute;& eacute;lanie Laurent). These films reflect shifting historical and aesthetic concerns, with each director offering a distinct interpretation shaped by their narrative priorities. Much like he once shaped the clinical understanding of hysteria and other neurological disorders, filmmakers have reshaped Charcot himself, transforming him into a sphinx-like figure: enigmatic, mutable, and interpretively rich. Rather than simply depicting Charcot, cinema often adopts his mode of seeing, using it as a lens to explore broader questions of perception, interpretation, and meaning-particularly as they pertain to illness, psychological distress, and the lived experience of human suffering. In this way, Charcot's legacy continues to resonate not only within medical history but also in visual culture.
AB - This article explores the evolving cinematic legacy of Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893), focusing on how his image has been interpreted across a range of films. The study examines portrayals ofCharcot in Freud: The Secret Passion (1962, directed by John Huston), Der junge Freud (1976, Axel Corti), Augustine (2003, Jean-Claude Monod and Jean-Christophe Valtat), Augustine (2012, Alice Winocour), and Le Bal des folles (2021, M & eacute;& eacute;lanie Laurent). These films reflect shifting historical and aesthetic concerns, with each director offering a distinct interpretation shaped by their narrative priorities. Much like he once shaped the clinical understanding of hysteria and other neurological disorders, filmmakers have reshaped Charcot himself, transforming him into a sphinx-like figure: enigmatic, mutable, and interpretively rich. Rather than simply depicting Charcot, cinema often adopts his mode of seeing, using it as a lens to explore broader questions of perception, interpretation, and meaning-particularly as they pertain to illness, psychological distress, and the lived experience of human suffering. In this way, Charcot's legacy continues to resonate not only within medical history but also in visual culture.
U2 - 10.1007/s10072-025-08498-9
DO - 10.1007/s10072-025-08498-9
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 40960570
SN - 1590-1874
VL - 46
SP - 6981
EP - 6986
JO - NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
JF - NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
IS - 12
ER -