TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypobaric versus Normobaric Hypoxia
T2 - A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study
AU - Vinetti, Giovanni
AU - Turner, Rachel
AU - Taboni, Anna
AU - Rauch, Simon
AU - Seraglio, Paolo Mario Enrico
AU - Netzer, Nikolaus
AU - Strapazzon, Giacomo
AU - Gatterer, Hannes
N1 - Lehr-KH Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano (BZ), ITALY
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - PURPOSE: There is controversy whether there are meaningful physiological differences between hypobaric (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH). This study aimed to compare the cardiorespiratory responses to acute HH and NH under strictly controlled conditions. We hypothesized no differences at rest and during submaximal exercise, whereas during maximal exercise, a higher maximal ventilation (V̇ Emax ), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O 2max ) in HH than in NH.METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind, crossover design, eight young healthy subjects (three females) were studied in an environmental chamber in which either the barometric pressure (HH) or the inspired oxygen fraction (NH) was reduced to the equivalent of ~4000 m altitude. Measurements were taken at rest, and during submaximal (moderate and high intensity) and maximal cycling exercise.RESULTS: All resting parameters were similar between HH and NH, except for a lower root mean square of the successive R-R interval differences in HH ( P < 0.05). SpO 2 was 2% higher in HH at all exercise intensities ( P < 0.05). During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation was similar between HH and NH. However, HH yielded a 7% lower tidal volume during moderate-intensity exercise ( P < 0.05) and a lower respiratory exchange ratio during high-intensity exercise ( P < 0.01). V̇ Emax and V̇O 2max were 11% and 6% higher in HH, respectively ( P < 0.01 for both). SpO 2 at maximal exercise was positively correlated with V̇ Emax , V̇ Emax /V̇O 2max , and V̇O 2max .CONCLUSIONS: The higher V̇O 2max found in HH than in NH can be attributed to the higher V̇ Emax counteracting desaturation at maximal exercise. Conversely, submaximal SpO 2 improved in HH through mechanisms other than increased ventilation. These findings are likely due to respiratory muscle unloading in HH, which operated through different mechanisms depending on exercise intensity.
AB - PURPOSE: There is controversy whether there are meaningful physiological differences between hypobaric (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH). This study aimed to compare the cardiorespiratory responses to acute HH and NH under strictly controlled conditions. We hypothesized no differences at rest and during submaximal exercise, whereas during maximal exercise, a higher maximal ventilation (V̇ Emax ), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O 2max ) in HH than in NH.METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind, crossover design, eight young healthy subjects (three females) were studied in an environmental chamber in which either the barometric pressure (HH) or the inspired oxygen fraction (NH) was reduced to the equivalent of ~4000 m altitude. Measurements were taken at rest, and during submaximal (moderate and high intensity) and maximal cycling exercise.RESULTS: All resting parameters were similar between HH and NH, except for a lower root mean square of the successive R-R interval differences in HH ( P < 0.05). SpO 2 was 2% higher in HH at all exercise intensities ( P < 0.05). During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation was similar between HH and NH. However, HH yielded a 7% lower tidal volume during moderate-intensity exercise ( P < 0.05) and a lower respiratory exchange ratio during high-intensity exercise ( P < 0.01). V̇ Emax and V̇O 2max were 11% and 6% higher in HH, respectively ( P < 0.01 for both). SpO 2 at maximal exercise was positively correlated with V̇ Emax , V̇ Emax /V̇O 2max , and V̇O 2max .CONCLUSIONS: The higher V̇O 2max found in HH than in NH can be attributed to the higher V̇ Emax counteracting desaturation at maximal exercise. Conversely, submaximal SpO 2 improved in HH through mechanisms other than increased ventilation. These findings are likely due to respiratory muscle unloading in HH, which operated through different mechanisms depending on exercise intensity.
KW - Humans
KW - Cross-Over Studies
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Hypoxia/physiopathology
KW - Oxygen Consumption/physiology
KW - Exercise/physiology
KW - Young Adult
KW - Adult
KW - Oxygen Saturation/physiology
KW - Altitude
KW - Atmospheric Pressure
KW - Exercise Test
KW - Tidal Volume/physiology
KW - High altitude
KW - Fio2
KW - Terraxcube
KW - Exercise performance
KW - Hypobaric chamber
KW - Heart rate variability
U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003578
DO - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003578
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 39365185
SN - 0195-9131
VL - 57
SP - 632
EP - 640
JO - MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
JF - MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
IS - 3
ER -